According to Meiland, a "good" college teachers present information in the following way.
They present information in the sense of "what is currently believed" and talking about the basis on which this information is usually believed.
Critical thinking is sometimes to break common sense or something usually believed.
To know what is currently believed is so important because if we don't know, we cant agree or disagree to them.
We can criticize only when we know the target.
Please also state directly whether you agree with Meiland (I understand that you do), and also include your very astute comment about how Meiland should explain his opinion more completely.
返信削除>>Chris
返信削除I see, so I should have write following sentences.
I agree to Meiland, but I also think his statement is not enough.
He doesn't explain in terms of "good" college teacher that we should know at first, and then we can decide agree or disagree, or we can criticize.
(He says them p1-7to1-9, the terms ob Basis of Belief.)